Archives

Carcinogen Chromium-6 in Tap Water of More Than 200 Million Americans

Young boy drinking from glass of water.

By David Andrews, Senior Scientist, and Bill Walker, Managing Editor
Environmental Working Group

Excerpts:

In the film “Erin Brockovich,” the environmental crusader confronts the lawyer of a power company that polluted the tap water of Hinkley, Calif., with a carcinogenic chemical called chromium-6. When the lawyer picks up a glass of water, Brockovich says: “We had that water brought in ‘specially for you folks. Came from a well in Hinkley.”

The lawyer sets down the glass and says, “I think this meeting’s over.”

Erin-Brockovich-Chromium-6

But almost 25 years after that real-life confrontation, the conflict over chromium-6 is not over. A new EWG analysis of federal data from nationwide drinking water tests shows that the compound contaminates water supplies for more than 200 million Americans in all 50 states. Yet federal regulations are stalled by a chemical industry challenge that could mean no national regulation of a chemical state scientists in California and elsewhere say causes cancer when ingested at even extraordinarily low levels.

<!–/*
* The backup image section of this tag has been generated for use on a
* non-SSL page. If this tag is to be placed on an SSL page, change the
* 'http://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
* to
* 'https://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
*
* This noscript section of this tag only shows image banners. There
* is no width or height in these banners, so if you want these tags to
* allocate space for the ad before it shows, you will need to add this
* information to the tag.
*
* If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript
* section, delete the tag (from … to ). On
* average, the noscript tag is called from less than 1% of internet
* users.
*/–>

This entry was posted on September 28, 2016, in health News.

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) Harmful for Babies

baby-questioning-eyes-Tylenol

by Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D.
Health Impact News

What if Tylenol is MORE Dangerous After the Baby’s Born?

An article in the New York Times this week warns that prenatal use of acetaminophen—the main ingredient in Tylenol—has been linked to an increased risk of asthma and attention disorders in children whose mothers took the drug.

Acetaminophen is found in over 600 over-the-counter and prescription medications. Petra Arck, professor of fetal-maternal medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, whose rodent experiments have found that acetaminophen stresses the liver and alters the placenta in pregnant mice, told the Times that because it’s so common pregnant women may be taking more acetaminophen than they are aware.

The damage done by acetaminophen seems to be dose dependent—the more a pregnant woman takes, the more serious the effects in her offspring. But since it’s found in so many products, many marketed for babies and children, what if infants, too, are being exposed to damagingly high levels of acetaminophen?

If acetaminophen can harm the fetus during pregnancy, when the baby has the protection of the mother’s liver, as well as the placenta, what if it’s even more harmful when given directly to infants?

Toys-r-us-tylenol-store-shelf

New science has raised troubling concerns about the safety of acetaminophen, the main ingredient in Tylenol, which is nonetheless marketed for pain and fever relief in infants. This photo was taken at a Toys R Us in North Carolina.

The increasing popularity of acetaminophen to treat fever and pain in small children began in the 1980s after it was discovered that aspirin might cause Reye syndrome, a rare but sometimes fatal disorder that causes seizures, liver swelling, and brain swelling. The concern over Reye syndrome back then seemed to justify halting the use of aspirin. But now there is a growing body of scientific evidence suggesting that we inadvertently replaced aspirin with something more dangerous.

In 2008 a team of researchers from UCSD and San Diego State, headed by Stephen Schultz, Ph.D., conducted a survey that found a 20-fold increase in the risk of brain disorders with use of acetaminophen after vaccination, but not with ibuprofen.

Taken out of context, the Schultz study was not enough to sound an alarm. It relied on participants’ recall and did not include independent verification of the amount of acetaminophen toddlers had been given. Another strike against it was that the study size was small (83 brain damaged children and 80 controls). But when you look at subsequent science that supports Schultz’s results, it becomes harder to understand why the medical community has generally ignored the possible harms of acetaminophen to children.

Indeed, a much larger study, involving more than 205,000 children, also published in 2008 (this time in The Lancet) found use of acetaminophen in the first year of life was associated with inflammatory diseases, including asthma and eczema by age six and seven.

Then in 2010, Schultz and Kevin Becker, Ph.D., who trained at Johns Hopkins in Molecular Biology and Genetics and is currently head of a research unit at the National Institutes of Health, hypothesized that the use of acetaminophen in early childhood “may significantly alter subtle immune processes,” and be a possible cause of both asthma and brain dysfunction.

William Shaw, Ph.D., a clinical chemist who had previously worked for the Centers for Disease Control, provides a detailed explanation of how acetaminophen causes damage: acetaminophen depletes the body’s supply of glutathione. Since glutathione is a molecule essential for clearing toxins, the use of acetaminophen can result in essentially a toxic wash of the brain during development.

Scientists now understand even more: acetaminophen derails something called DNA methylation, which is vital in the developmental biology of most life as we know it, from bacteria to humans. Unless you are a single-celled yeast or a tiny roundworm, two organisms that don’t use DNA methylation to control development, acetaminophen can disrupt an essential biological process, one that you need to have a healthy brain and body.

William Parker, Ph.D., an associate professor at Duke University Medical School, who has co-authored of over a hundred peer-reviewed articles and whose career has been dedicated to studying immune function, argues we need to be even more concerned about acetaminophen use in infants than in pregnant women.

“Based on available evidence, small children taking it may be many times worse off than during pregnancy,” Parker tells me. “But nobody knows because it’s never been tested. That should be very scary. Anyone who’s taken the time to read the literature will say, ‘Whoa, this is not safe.’”

With two additional studies coming out in the last three months, the total number of peer-reviewed studies finding associations between long-term neurological problems in children and exposure to acetaminophen from conception to early childhood stands at nine. Not one study has shown acetaminophen to be safe. Nine seems like quite a bit, but the FDA, the NHS, and many medical doctors still seem to be waiting for something more.

The accumulated science is enough for me to invoke the precautionary principle: the idea that an intervention must be proven safe before it can be assumed not to cause harm. New parents, as much as expectant couples and pregnant moms, need to take note. As a science journalist and a mother of four, I’m throwing the baby Tylenol in the trash.

JenniferLookingSideJennifer Margulis, Ph.D., is a science journalist, Fulbright awardee, and co-author, with Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D., of The Vaccine-Friendly Plan: Dr. Paul’s Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health, From Pregnancy Through Your Child’s Teen Years.

Jennifer Margulis, Ph.D., will be speaking, along with Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D., at Pure Life Chiropractic in Eugene, Oregon on October 8 from 3 to 4:30 (this event is free and open to the public), giving a keynote speech at the BirthWorks conference in Mount Laurel, New Jersey (near Philadelphia) on October 15, and touring Chicago and Michigan December 8th through 11th. To find out more visit www.JenniferMargulis.net

 

The-Vaccine-Friendly-Plan

Image from Penguin Random House.

 

<!–/*
* The backup image section of this tag has been generated for use on a
* non-SSL page. If this tag is to be placed on an SSL page, change the
* 'http://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
* to
* 'https://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
*
* This noscript section of this tag only shows image banners. There
* is no width or height in these banners, so if you want these tags to
* allocate space for the ad before it shows, you will need to add this
* information to the tag.
*
* If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript
* section, delete the tag (from … to ). On
* average, the noscript tag is called from less than 1% of internet
* users.
*/–>

This entry was posted on September 28, 2016, in health News.

Food Club Members Fight Back: Sue State for Food Rights

Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund

No More Mr. Nice Guy: Food Club Members Seek to Uphold Food Rights

By David Gumpert
DavidGumpert.com

Excerpts:

For years now, farmers have borne the brunt of government efforts to interfere with food rights and consumer access to the foods of their choice.

That may be about to change, as consumers launch actions to take the burden of government harassment off farmers’ backs.

A case in point, and apparently the first consumer to launch a food rights legal action, is Michigan businessman and herdshare member Mike Lobsinger, who a few months ago sued the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD) over its seizure of his cream in a June raid of the farm that fulfills his herdshare agreement.  As reported by the Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, he argues in his suit that the cream is his private property and that the seizure violates the due process clause of both the Michigan and United States constitutions. A hearing on his case is scheduled next month in state court.

Read the Full Article Here.

<!–/*
* The backup image section of this tag has been generated for use on a
* non-SSL page. If this tag is to be placed on an SSL page, change the
* 'http://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
* to
* 'https://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
*
* This noscript section of this tag only shows image banners. There
* is no width or height in these banners, so if you want these tags to
* allocate space for the ad before it shows, you will need to add this
* information to the tag.
*
* If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript
* section, delete the tag (from … to ). On
* average, the noscript tag is called from less than 1% of internet
* users.
*/–>

This entry was posted on September 27, 2016, in health News.

If Only Half of America is Properly Vaccinated, Where are the Epidemics?

Herd of sheeps in mountains on Georgia, Caucasus

While herd immunity may not exist, herd mentality most definitely does. Health authorities, media commentators, and schools and their parent–teacher associations waste no opportunity in perpetuating this myth.

by Gretchen DuBeau, Esq.
The Vaccine Reaction

Excerpts:

In 2014, an outbreak of whooping cough (pertussis) broke out in the San Diego area. Of the 621 individuals who were infected, nearly all of them were completely up to date on all preventive vaccinations. If vaccines are given to protect from disease, how could this happen?

San Diego public health official Dr. Wilma Wooten argued that the cause was related to a decrease in the protection offered by vaccines after the first year. This answer is most revealing, in that it speaks to the actual efficacy of vaccines. It also shows that the concept of herd immunity is largely myth—and completely misunderstood.

The theory of herd immunity states that when a critical mass of the population (usually stipulated at 95%) is vaccinated against a disease, the possibility of outbreaks is eliminated. This is the main argument that is used to shame parents who wish to refuse certain vaccinations for their children: by not vaccinating, they put the health of the “herd” at risk.

However, if vaccines start losing effectiveness after the first year, as Dr. Wooten says, then constant revaccination would be required, since the immunity offered is only temporary for most vaccines. Achieving the required rate of protection is virtually impossible under this paradigm.

Of course, if we look back over the decades and note the lack of rampant epidemics in our nation, while remembering that vaccine protection is in perpetual decline, the myth of herd immunity quickly unravels. Our society has never achieved this level of herd immunity, yet not a single major outbreak of disease has occurred.

While herd immunity may not exist, herd mentality most definitely does. Health authorities, media commentators, and schools and their parent–teacher associations waste no opportunity in perpetuating this myth. Proponents have done such a thorough job of convincing the public that a parent who questions it is treated like someone who thinks the earth is flat or believes climate change is a conspiracy. On the contrary: an unprejudiced view of the science about vaccines, and an examination of history, clearly show that the herd immunity theory is—and always has been—flawed.

Vaccines may have a place in our medical arsenal, but they are not the silver bullet they’re portrayed to be. Year after year the pharmaceutical industry, looking for lucrative new profit centers, churns out new vaccines. They use pseudo-science to convince the public that these products are safe and effective, and they use public shaming to convince the citizenry that non-compliance is a public health threat. This entire racket completely falls apart with a close examination of the herd immunity myth. Until we are honest in our assessment of both the safety and efficacy of vaccines, kids will continue to be hurt, rights will continue to be trampled, and mythology will continue to trump science.

Read the Full Article at The Vaccine Reaction.

Gretchen DuBeau is the executive director of Alliance for Natural Health USA.

Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com.

rising-from-the-dead

Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people. In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine. FREE Shipping Available! Order here.

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

Medical_Doctors_Opposed_to_Forced_Vaccinations_Should_Their_Views_be_Silence_sm

eBook – Available for immediate download.

One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this eBook, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.

Read:

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

on your mobile device!

$0.99

Kindle Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations - Should Their Views be Silenced? Book icon

<!–/*
* The backup image section of this tag has been generated for use on a
* non-SSL page. If this tag is to be placed on an SSL page, change the
* 'http://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
* to
* 'https://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
*
* This noscript section of this tag only shows image banners. There
* is no width or height in these banners, so if you want these tags to
* allocate space for the ad before it shows, you will need to add this
* information to the tag.
*
* If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript
* section, delete the tag (from … to ). On
* average, the noscript tag is called from less than 1% of internet
* users.
*/–>

Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm

dr_andrew_moulden_every_vaccine_produces_harm

eBook – Available for immediate download.

Canadian physician Dr. Andrew Moulden provided clear scientific evidence to prove that every dose of vaccine given to a child or an adult produces harm. The truth that he uncovered was rejected by the conventional medical system and the pharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, his warning and his message to America remains as a solid legacy of the man who stood up against big pharma and their program to vaccinate every person on the Earth.

Dr. Moulden died unexpectedly in November of 2013 at age 49.

Because of the strong opposition from big pharma concerning Dr. Moulden’s research, we became concerned that the name of this brilliant researcher and his life’s work had nearly been deleted from the internet. His reputation was being disparaged, and his message of warning and hope was being distorted and buried without a tombstone. This book summarizes his teaching and is a must-read for everyone who wants to learn the “other-side” of the vaccine debate that the mainstream media routinely censors.

Read:

Read Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm on your mobile device!

on your mobile device!

$3.99

Kindle Dr. Andrew Moulden: Every Vaccine Produces Harm Book icon

<!–/*
* The backup image section of this tag has been generated for use on a
* non-SSL page. If this tag is to be placed on an SSL page, change the
* 'http://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
* to
* 'https://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
*
* This noscript section of this tag only shows image banners. There
* is no width or height in these banners, so if you want these tags to
* allocate space for the ad before it shows, you will need to add this
* information to the tag.
*
* If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript
* section, delete the tag (from … to ). On
* average, the noscript tag is called from less than 1% of internet
* users.
*/–>

This entry was posted on September 27, 2016, in health News.

Texas Judge Allows Mother to Homeschool Her Own Children – Denies Request to Vaccinate Children While in State Custody

Claire and William Rembis studying law at the Texas Tech Law Library, preparing for their Adversary hearing. Image from Facebook.

Claire and William Rembis studying law at the Texas Tech Law Library, preparing for their Adversary hearing. Image from Facebook.

by Health Impact News/MedicalKidnap.com Staff

Although Claire and William Rembis from Texas were disappointed that their children were not returned home on Tuesday 9/20, they feel confident that the children will be home “quickly,” as stated by Judge Hart.  A Status Update hearing is scheduled for 10/5 to confirm that the Rembis’ have stable housing and employment before the children can be returned home.

Some of the rulings made by Judge Hart – such as being able to continue home-schooling, no vaccines, and no haircuts for the boys – were landmark rulings and victories for foster families everywhere, according to Claire Rembis.

Mainstream Media has reported on the Rembis family story also, but seem to have only reported on allegations made against the family in family court, before the family had a chance to present their side of the story. Health Impact News presents the family’s story also.

Family Loses Everything Choosing to Protect Children from CPS Trauma

The family has suffered incredible financial hardships and heartaches because they chose to leave town temporarily to protect their children from potential sexual abuse and trauma from CPS, like the children had suffered at the hands of Texas CPS in 2015.

When they chose to temporarily leave Lubbock in August, William left a good paying job, the family was wrongfully evicted (which they are fighting), and their home was burglarized.

To review the initial allegations leading to the CPS investigation in Lubbock, and to hear the entire De Novo hearing as recorded on YouTube, see:

Homeschool Texas Family Terrorized by CPS for Speaking Out and For Having Too Many Children at Home

After the De Novo hearing in August, Claire and the children began to fear for their safety when social worker Kris Stecklein allegedly began harassing them at their home multiple times per day, pounding on the door, yelling, peeking through windows, and getting neighbors to spy on them. They decided to take a trip to Colorado to visit a friend, to clear their minds and find legal counsel from a safe distance from Stecklein.

While visiting a friend in Colorado, urgent business called Claire and William back to Texas, for what they thought would be a one-day quick trip. While in Texas, William was arrested on charges on 8/25 for driving on a Michigan license. He was jailed, just long enough for him and Claire to be “served” with the Emergency Removal Order and a petition to terminate their parental rights.

Claiming that they were “missing persons,” Colorado police aided Texas CPS in apprehending 10 of the 11 Rembis children, placing them into Texas state custody. See:

Colorado Police Help Texas CPS Kidnap Rembis Children and Bring Back to Texas – Father Jailed

Children Cry to Come Home During Visits

Andrew breaking down because he cannot come home.

“Andrew breaking down because he cannot come home.” Image provided by family.

Claire describes how the children cry and ask when they can come home during visits, but says they are forbidden from answering their children’s questions, or CPS will terminate their visits:

As we are leaving, most of the kids start crying & asking when they can come home. It’s very overwhelming for everyone to cry at the same time. This unnecessary hurt is just so unfair.

"Aurora trying not to cry at a recent visit." Image supplied by family.

“Aurora trying not to cry at a recent visit.” Image supplied by family.

Rembis’ are Hopeful the Children Will Be Returned October 5th

Claire explains:

The judge said that the kids will be back, ‘pretty quickly.’ He said that he felt ‘forced’ to keep them in custody because we went to Colorado before taking them to the CPS office for interviews & inspections.

Our Babies at a recent CPS vist.

“Our babies at a recent CPS visit. Hopefully, the children will come home October 5th.” Image supplied by family.

Claire says that the judge had some concerns, but considered them “fixable.”  He set a Status Update hearing for October 5th, to confirm that the Rembis’ have gainful employment and stable housing.

Closet floor

One of the judge’s “concerns” was a hole in the children’s closet that they swept trash into, rather than putting it into a garbage can. Photo given to Rembis’ during Adversary hearing.

Willie already has a new job, and the family is working on staying in their current home, but they need to come up with over $1200 by Monday 9/26, plus extra money to furnish the home and replace items that were stolen when the house was burglarized.

Claire continues to stand on the Word of God as found in Philippians 4:19:

But my God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus.

You can help support the Rembis’ today by donating here.

Judge Hart Chastises Stecklein for Inappropriate Behavior with Rembis Child

Claire reveals:

My daughter told me that the CPS worker, Stecklein, took her to the movies. Kristin told her that they were going to go back this Friday, to see another movie together. Just the 2 of them?!

Claire says Judge Hart told Stecklein that it was inappropriate for her to take Cinderella to a movie and that she must stop.

Stecklein Allegedly Admits to Asking Neighbor to Take Photo of Pocahontas in Alley

On the evening of August 10th, when police investigated an allegation of children rummaging in the dumpster, William explained to the police that he and some of the children were only taking trash out to the dumpster, and that the children were not rummaging in the dumpster.

8-10 kids in dumpsters

Allegations made by CPS the night of 8/10. Charges like these felt like harassment to the Rembis’, who deny that their children eat from dumpsters. Image supplied by Rembis family from CPS document.

Claire says Stecklein admitted under oath that she was in the neighbor’s backyard and got the neighbor to take a photo of Pocahontas, “proving that the children walk in the alley barefoot.”

Pocahontas in alley barefoot

Image of Pocahontas barefoot in the alley when she took trash out with her dad. Stecklein allegedly asked a neighbor to take the photo for her. Photo was supplied to Claire in court.

Claire finds it disturbing that her neighbor and Stecklein called her daughter over towards them in order to take her picture.

Judge Allows Children to Continue to be Homeschooled

At the closing of the Adversary hearing on 9/20, Judge Hart ruled that since the children will be “going home quickly,” they can continue to homeschool with their mother Claire Rembis as their teacher.

Claire reports that CPS objected, asking, “what about the children who want to go to public school?” Judge Hart replied that it didn’t matter because it was the parents’ decision, and that since the children are going to be homeschooled when they get home, it didn’t make sense for them to go to public school.

Praise God, in an unprecedented, never before seen decision, Judge Kevin Hart ordered that I, Claire Rembis AKA “Mommy,” be allowed to continue to educate the kids. So, while in foster care, I will still be their teacher.

This is monumental. This is a step in the right direction in trying to overhaul the entire Texas CPS system that is currently in crisis. Please share this incredible decision & be sure to give thanks to God

Judge Denied CPS’ Request to Vaccinate Children or Cut Boys’ Hair

Judge Hart also ruled that the state could not give any vaccines to the children. This was a relief to the Rembis’ who hold strong religious convictions regarding vaccines, after learning about their risks and harmful ingredients like fetal cells cultured from aborted babies.

One of their children almost died from vaccine injuries related to the DTaP vaccine, and now suffers from Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP), a bleeding disorder in which the blood does not clot normally.

Two children were previously diagnosed with autism, which the Rembis’ also attribute to vaccine injuries, another reason the Rembis’ are now wary of vaccines. Claire says Lubbock CPS tried to accuse them of medical neglect for not having the children on medication for their autism, but she explained in court that the children are very high functioning and that they were never prescribed any medication. The Rembis’ say that their healthy lifestyle of avoiding GMO’s and foods with dyes and preservatives, switching to natural cleaning products, toothpastes deodorants, etc., have helped their children to the point that they do not exhibit autistic behaviors.

After explaining that the boys’ long hair is a cultural choice and that they had been wrongfully punished in public schools with “detention,” William and Claire were relieved by Hart’s ruling that the boys’ hair could not be cut without parental permission.

Help Support the Rembis Family

The Rembis family cannot understand why CPS continues to harass their family. Image supplied by family.

Thankfully, many people are reaching out to the Rembis’ in public, saying things like:

I’m so sorry your family is going through this!  Your family is clearly being railroaded!

The family is financially devastated from this ordeal and needs immediate financial support for housing and furniture and finances for a private attorney.

Pray for my husband & I. The pain is so intense & our hearts hurt more than we ever imagined possible. Pray for financial provisions as we dropped everything, including my husbands good job, to try to protect the kids from CPS.

Please consider donating to the family here: Family Defense Resources

Rembis facebook page

Check The Rembis Family Facebook Page for regular updates.

Comment on this article at MedicalKidnap.com.

 

Support the cause of Medical Kidnapping by purchasing our new book!

If you know people who are skeptical and cannot believe that medical kidnapping happens in the U.S. today, this is the book for them! Backed with solid references and real life examples, they will not be able to deny the plain evidence before them, and will become better educated on this topic that is destroying the American family.

Medical Kidnapping final

1 Book – 228 pages
Retail: $24.99
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $14.99
Order here!

medical-kidnapping-x2

2 Books
Retail: $49.98 (for 2 books)
FREE Shipping Available!
Now: $19.99 (for 2 books)

Order here!

Also available as eBook:

Kindle Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations - Should Their Views be Silenced? Book icon

eBook – Download Immediately!
$9.99

Save

<!–/*
* The backup image section of this tag has been generated for use on a
* non-SSL page. If this tag is to be placed on an SSL page, change the
* 'http://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
* to
* 'https://healthimpactnews.com/openx/www/delivery/…'
*
* This noscript section of this tag only shows image banners. There
* is no width or height in these banners, so if you want these tags to
* allocate space for the ad before it shows, you will need to add this
* information to the tag.
*
* If you do not want to deal with the intricities of the noscript
* section, delete the tag (from … to ). On
* average, the noscript tag is called from less than 1% of internet
* users.
*/–>

This entry was posted on September 26, 2016, in health News.